A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46
I. TYPE CONSIDERED BEST FOR WORK IN FOUR HAZARD GROUPS
From this analysis, it may be seen that almost half the men interviewed did not wear waistcoats for their work: a significantly higher proportion of agricultural workers than men in any of the other three hazard groups did wear waistcoats for work. There are no large differences between types worn and types preferred. Of those men who wore waistcoats, considerably more wore tweed waistcoats than any other type.
In a comparison of types preferred and types worn, figures show that 94% of those men who preferred tweed waistcoats were wearing them. Of the 130 men who preferred various “other” types, 14% were wearing tweed and 86% were, in fact, wearing “other” varieties.
Alternatives suggest by the men who preferred tweed and “other” types of waistcoats are given below.
II. ALTERNATIVES
TYPE PREFERRED | Tweed | Suiting | Serge | Other Types | Not given | SAMPLE |
% | % | % | % | % | ||
Tweed | (54) | - | 1 | 25 | 25 | 355 |
Other types | 18 | - | 1 | (61) | 22 | 130 |
III. REASONS FOR PREFERENCE
Separate analysis is given below of the reasons for wearing tweed waistcoats for work: the total figure includes, for purposes of comparison, reasons given for wearing serge, suiting and other types of waistcoats.
IV. ANALYSIS BY REGION
The proportions of men in the different hazard groups were distributed as follows:-
Reference should be made to the significant differences in proportions of men interviewed in each of the four hazard groups in the five areas as explained in the section of this report relating to Men’s Footwear, page 12.
Best Type of Waistcoat for Work
Analysed by Five Areas
(Total figure of 1262 shown on above table is 50 larger than total figure of 1212 shown on table relating to best type and type worn, because in these latter breakdowns, 50 cards were unclassified for “length of time in job” - one of the factors involved in these breakdowns.)
The above table should be considered in conjunction with the analysis of hazard group by area given above.