A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46
In the foregoing pages, the causes responsible for the failure to collect salvage were analysed in detail for each kind of salvage. The next table is a summary of this information.
In this connection, the results obtained from another question are of interest. Informants were asked “What sort of things could you salvage if a special appeal were made?”. After the question was asked, a list of items was read out. The following tables show the results.
The tables are self-explanatory. It seems that stores of old paper, magazines, cardboard, etc, could still be found. Of metal things, old keys, toothpaste tubes and bent nails are most frequently mentioned as articles which could be given up.
No rubber item is mentioned as possible for salvage by more than a small percentage; old rubber shoes, boots and hot water bottles are those most often mentioned.
Well over one-third of the sample think they could turn out their rag-bag, and one-fifth think they could save snippets and clothes cuttings. Old dusters are mentioned by 16%.
What a collection of the different items mentioned might amount to in salvage tonnage, we have no means of Judging.
From Table 16, it can be seen that paper, metal, rags and bones, which theoretically could be salvaged, are in many cases put to other uses, and the same is true, though to a lesser degree, for kitchen waste.
It is mainly for kitchen waste that housewives consider themselves unable to salvage because there is nobody to collect it. A small number refer to the Same difficulty for paper (5%) and bones (4%).
On the whole, badly organised collection is not often given as a reason for not salvaging; though it is possible that this unconsciously makes it easier not to salvage at all, even if there are also other reasons for not doing so.
Few housewives say that they don’t salvage because they don’t see any particular need, or that they forget. This low figure can be taken as showing that by now the ovenwhelming majority of housewives is salvage-conscious: salvage publicity has been effective in this respect.
If the results shown in Table 16 are compared with similar results obtained in the 1942 investigation it will be found that the most prevalent reasons for not salvaging are given with very similar frequency.
Results for metal and paper cannot be compared directly, as the respective questions were asked differently.
Except in the case of bones (Table 15), no significant group differences were found for any of the questions discussed in this section.