HOME INTELLIGENCE
APPENDIX
M.O.I. FILMS AND THE PUBLIC
SECRET
An Investigation by the Wartime Social Survey into Public Reaction to the Films made by the Films Division of the Ministry of Information.
The Sample
The purpose of the investigation was to answer a number of questions put by the Films Division. Enquiry was made in three centres selected for their representation of certain types.
Leamington
.
A reception area town with many evacuees from adjacent bombed industrial districts. In peace-time, Leamington has a high proportion of retired professional people (c.f. Cheltenham).
Bristol
.
A town much expanded by war production, and severely bombed.
Glasgow
.
A northern and Scottish industrial centre, with a large Irish element.
Results are given for the three areas in each case, and no attempt has been made to construct what would inevitably have been, in view of the small number of areas covered, an unrepresentative and misleading composite figure.
Interviewing took place between September 2nd and 13th in all areas. Some 1,700 calls were made on individuals selected by random sampling methods from the index of ration cards in each area.
Some of the main findings are summarised below.
1.
What Percentage of film audiences are conscious of having seen M.O.I. films
?
In Glasgow 82%, in Leamington 70% in Bristol 71%, of cinema-goers remembered seeing M.O.I. films.
The investigation established that in the three areas covered some 37% of cinema-goers visited the cinema only occasionally, i.e. less than once a month. It will be seen therefore that the physical penetration of M.O.I. films reaches a high level.
In two areas men were more conscious of having seen the films than women.
82% men against 70% women in Glasgow;
80% men against 65% women in Bristol.
In Leamington, however, women were more conscious of having seen the films than men: 75% women against 68% men.
2.
Do Cinema-goers prefer Dramatised or Undramatised films (Documentaries)
?
There were marked differences in the reactions recorded in the three areas.
Preferred
Glasgow
%
Leamington
%
Bristol
%
Dramatised
56.6
40.4
68
Undramatised
43.4
59.6
32
A detailed analysis of the results by social class showed that the general position was fairly constant for each town. It would appear, therefore, that regional preferences are of established importance in this connection.
3.
Do cinema-goers enjoy M.O.I. films or would they prefer to see the usual type of short picture
?
This question aimed at testing M.O.I. films by comparison with the type of short film known to most cinema-goers.
The results indicated that in no town or Social Group were there less than 70% expressing a definite liking for M.O.I. films, and that the proportion of persons preferring the ordinary type of films was very small. There was a high degree of indifference in Leamington.
Enjoy M.O.I films
%
Do not mind
%
Would prefer usual type
%
Glasgow
79.3
17.
3.7
Leamington
73.4
22.7
3.9
Bristol
80.7
11.8
7.6
4.
What Influence do M.O.I. films have on Cinema-goers
?
(a) Questions were asked to establish the extent to which the films were discussed.
Have you discussed these films with friends, or at home?
Glasgow
%
Leamington
%
Bristol
%
Have discussed films at home, - with friends
68
55
65
Have not discussed films
32
45
35
It will be seen that in each town a majority of cinema-goers have discussed M.O.I. films. It was further established that in each area a majority of cinema-goers had heard M.O.I. films
discussed by others
. Detailed analysis revealed that even amongst non-cinema-goers appreciable proportions recalled hearing the films discussed.
Have you heard the films discussed?
Non-Cinema-goers:
Glasgow
%
Leamington
%
Bristol
%
Have heard films discussed
41
25
31
Have not heard films discussed
59
75
69
(b) As well as noting how far the films were discussed an attempt was made to estimate the extent to which M.O.I. films made an impact on cinema-goers. (For this purpose those interviewed who said that they had learnt from the films and those who stated that their actions had been influenced by the films, were grouped together as ‘influenced’.)
A significant difference as between the three areas emerges from the figures given below.
Glasgow
%
Leamington
%
Bristol
%
Not influenced
47
57
34
Took action
30
21
42.5
Learnt only
23
22
23.5
Once again, Leamington shows the most indifference.
Of those indicating that they had taken some action following on seeing the film:-
About 22%
mentioned greater attention to avoiding waste, collecting salvage, etc.
About 2[Text Missing]%
indicated that the films inspired a desire to do more, to participate in the war effort in some way, or that the contact felt more patriotic.
About 12%
indicated that contacts were avoiding careless talk.
About 18%
indicated greater care in observing A.R.P. or the blackout.
Running through both types of comments - those indicating that something had been learnt, or that action had resulted from seeing the films, - there were general indications that the value of films lay in their helping people to “realise things more clearly”, that “the war has been kept in my mind by the films, and does not seem so far off”.
5.
Were cinema-goers conscious of the fact that public money was spent on these films
?
In Glasgow 64%; Leamington 38%; and Bristol 34%, of cinema-goers were conscious of this fact. This figure includes those saying “The Government”, “The taxpayer”, “I pay for them”, or the “Ministry of Information”.
6.
Was it thought that money was put to good purpose or would other media of information be preferred
?
Glasgow
%
Leamington
%
Bristol
%
Put to good purpose ..........
85
87.6
90.2
Spend rather on newspapers and magazine advertising .........
4
.4
.6
Spend rather on posters .......
2.2
1.2
Nil
Other ways ....................
1.7
2.4
.6
Don't know ....................
7.1
8.4
8.5
It should be noted that these figures do not give indications of positive reactions in favour of the other media noted. The figures noting preference for other media are only the expression of negative reaction towards Films as a medium for information.