A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

1 2

I NATIONAL WHEATMEAL BREAD (i)

New Series Regional G.1

An Inquiry carried out by the Wartime Social Survey for the Ministry of Food Interviewing: 30 April to 13 May, 1942

A general sample of 2008 persons representative of the adult civilian population was interviewed. Men and women were selected in representative proportions from different regions and occupation groups.

The purpose of this inquiry was to find out what people thought of the National Wheatmeal Loaf. National Wheatmeal Bread was introduced compulsorily on 6th April, 1942, but had been available in the shops for some months before.

Informants were asked: “How do you think the bread the shops are selling now compares with white bread?”

Results were as follows:

%
Better than white bread 22.9
Not so good as white bread 48.5
Better in some way and worse in others 5.5
Like both equally 20.6
Don't know 2.5
SAMPLE 2008

There are no significant differences in the answers received from men and women, or from people in different age groups.

Analysis by income group show that A. and B, classes are markedly more in favour of National Wheatmeal Bread than C. and D. classes.

Class A & B
%
Class C & D
%
Total
%
Better than white bread 36.3 ± 5.4 20.8 22.9
Not so good as white bread 31.5 50.6 48.5
Better in some ways and worse in others 7.3 4.9 5.5
Like both equally 22.8 21.2 20.6
Don't know 2.1 2.5 2.5
SAMPLE * 289 * 1572 2008

* The retired and unoccupied group were not classified according to income, and are, therefore, excluded. This accounts for the discrepancy in the totals.

Three occupational groups show some differences from the average. There is a tendency for workers in heavy industry to have a less favourable opinion of N.W.B., whereas those in the managerial and professional group, and to a lesser extent clerical workers, are more favourable.

Though the sample figures for these group are small, calculation of the margin of error shows that these differences are significant.

Heavy Indistry
%
Managerial and Professional
%
Clerical
%
Total
%
Better than white bread 12.2 ± 5.6 41.5 ± 8.8 30.6 ± 5.4 22.9
Not so good as white bread 63.3 ± 7.0 30.0 ± 7.4 40.2 ± 5.8 48.5
Better in some ways and worse in others 0.7 6.9 4.1 5.5
Like both equally 22.4 20.8 22.7 20.6
Don't know 1.4 0.8 2.4 2.5
SAMPLE 139 130 291 2008

Housewives and other occupational groups show no significant differences from the total figures.

An analysis of answers from urban and rural districts showed no differences.

In addition to classifying informants' answers to this question, interviewers were asked to record their actual words.

Analysis of these comments shows that nearly half of those who prefer white bread (21.5% of the whole sample)do not dislike N.W.B their answer being recorded as “Good, but prefer white”, or “it's all right, but I prefer white”.

Of the rest 135 (6.6% of sample) expressed strong dislike, 167 (8.2% of sample)complained that it affected their health, and 233 (11.5% of sample) thought that it got stale too quickly.

Some informants expressed their views in detail ascribing more than one attribute to the bread, and it should be noted that such remarks have been classified separately, so that percentages given in the table below add up to more than 100. This, for example, addition of the percentages in the “Unfavourable” group does not give the percentage of persons given unfavourable answer but a higher percentage, as some information gave answers falling into two or more categories in this group.

Favourable No. %
Like it. Very nice. Prefer it to white. Good for health. More nutritious. 348 17.1
Easily digestible. Good for bowels. 135 6.6
Always have eaten brown bread. 89 4.4
More satisfying. 35 1.7
Good for sandwiches, toast, etc. and miscellaneous favourable remark 18 0.9
Neutral 307 15.5
All right. Don't dislike it. Don't mind. 437 21.5
All right, good, but prefer white. 76 3.7
Getting use to it. It takes getting used to. It varies. 40 2.0
Unfavourable
Can't it. Terrible. Dreadful. Does not suit me at all. 135 6.6
Unappetising. Flavour not so nice. Less platable 74 3.6
Upsets digestion. Causes diarrhoea or rash. Too laxative. 167 8.2
Gets stale quickly. Gets dry. 233 11.5
Not so satisfying. 50 2.5
Coarse, Crumbles a lot. Bad for sandwiches, toast, etc. 34 1.7
Miscellaneous unfavourable remarks. 76 3.7
SAMPLE 2008

It will be seen that the most frequently given objection to National Wheatmeal Bread, (11.5% of sample)is that it gets dry or stale quickly.

Of those who mentioned the effect as against 135 (6.6% of sample) who said it had a good effect.

Detailed analysis of the above table between men and women shows no significant differences.

Sample

Adult Civilian Population Total 2008

Region %
Scotland 12.2
North of England 29.0
Midlands and Wales 21.3
South, South-West and E. Anglia 23.2
London 14.3
Type of Distrct %
Urban 86.7
Rural 13.3
Sex %
Men 43.1
Women 56.9
Age %
Under 20 8.4
20–30 19.4
31–45 33.8
46–65 27.7
Over 65 10.7
Occupation Group %
Housewives 30.8
Agriculture 4.6
Mining 3.1
Heavy Industry 7.0
Light Industry 15.1
Building and Roads 3.2
Transport and public services 4.0
Clerical 6.7
Distributive 7.8
Miscellaneous services 4.7
Managerial 4.1
Professional 2.4
Retired and Unoccupied 6.5

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close