A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

3.

1. SAMPLE

The size of the sample was based on the results of two earlier inquiries carried out by the Wartime Social Survey, one of which indicated the approximate number of gardens growing vegetables, and the other the extent to which the different kinds of vegetables were grown. It was designed to give not less than a 100 gardens in which the least popular vegetable was grown. This design failed in the case of three kinds of vegetables only.

The sample was stratified by Region, Urban and Rural district, and size of town, and was restricted to England and Wales. In each of the forty-one towns and districts chosen + , a random sample of households was taken from the local Rating Lists, and it was ascertained whether or not each house had a garden, defined as a cultivable plot of ground, and, if it had a garden, whether or not it was cultivated for vegetables or fruit.

No %
Houses without garden 1,239 34
Houses not growing vegetables or fruit 751 21
Houses growing vegetables and fruit 1,624 45
Sample 3,614 100

It was possible to obtain interview’s at only, 1,419, or 87.5%, of the houses where fruit or vegetables were grown, because, apart from a small number of refusals, it was not possible to find the gardener at home at a convenient hour in the remaining cases. At the 1, 419 houses where interviews were conducted,1,345 grew vegetables, and 939 grew fruit. If one assumes that the 1, 419 are equivalent to the 1,624 this means that 42% of all households grow vegetables and 30% of all households grow fruit.

At each house it was also discovered whether or not livestock was kept.

No. %
Houses with livestock 522 14
Houses without livestock 3,092 86
Sample 3,614 100

Only 508 interviews with keepers of livestock could be obtained.. Of these 72% kept laying hens, 58% kept other fowls, 30% kept rabbits, while a small proportion kept each of the remaining livestock listed on the recording schedule.

4.

Analysis of Urban and Rural Districts

A comparison was made between the proportion of houses with gardens in urban and rural districts. Rural districts are administrative rural districts.

Urban Rural
No. % No. %
Houses with no gardens 1,201 38 38 9
Houses with uncultivated gardens 722 22 29 7
Houses with cultivated gardens 1,267 40 357 84
Sample 3,190 100 424 100

The proportion of completed schedules for rural districts is lower than it should be. Estimates place the proportion of houses in rural districts at between 15% and 18%, 12% of houses in the sample were in rural areas.

A similar analysis was made for livestock keepers.

Urban Rural
No. % No. %
House with livestock 391 12 131 31
Houses without livestock 2,799 88 293 69
Sample 3,190 100 424 100

[1] See Appendix 1.

Analysis by Region

The proportion of households with cultivated gardens in each Region was as follows: -

Region Percentage of Cult. Gardens No. of Calls Region Percentage of Cult. Gardens No. of Calls
% %
North 34 268 London 47 661 +
North-East 25 363 South-East 75 165
North-West 11 664 South 60 208
North-Mid. 44 223 South-West 52 288
Midlands 47 364 Wales 68 152
East 60 258

As might be expected, the percentage of cultivated gardens increases from North to South.

[2] This excluded Central London, which had no representation in the sample.

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close