A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

68

Appendix 1.
The Sample

Two purposive samples were used for this survey. The regions and types of town covered in each sample were similar, and identical basic numbers of interviews for different groups were sought. Below are details of the samples as planned.

Sample One. National Wheatmeal Bread, Milk, Eggs, Advertising. Questionnaire 7 .

A = 200 B = 600 C = 1100 D = 1100 Total
U R U R U R U R U R
1. Scotland 16 6 60 7 112 10 112 10 300 33
2. South Wales 6 6 27 10 57 10 63 4 153 30
3. South West 10 6 31 13 61 21 61 20 162 60
4. South 9 2 27 6 50 11 50 11 136 30
5. S.E. & London 34 2 102 7 187 14 187 14 510 37
6. Eastern 6 7 22 15 41 27 41 27 110 76
7. Midland 16 2 51 6 91 10 90 11 248 29
8. N. Midland 10 5 30 14 55 25 55 25 150 69
9. North West 26 2 77 8 137 20 145 13 385 43
10. North & N.E. 25 4 80 7 144 17 145 16 394 44
Totals 158 42 507 93 934 165 949 151 2548 451
Urban Calls Rural Calls Total
Glasgow, N. Aberdeen, Stirling Outside Aberdeen, Stirling. 333
Swansea, Merthyr. Outside Merthyr. 183
Bristol, N. Taunton, Weymouth Taunton, Weymouth 223
Oxford, Portsmouth, Newbury. Newbury. 166
London (400), Sevenoaks, Maidstone. Sevenoaks, Maidstone. 547
Ipswich, Kings Lynn, Bedford. Kings Lynn, Bedford. 186
Birmingham, W. Coventry, Stafford, Hereford. Hereford. 277
Leicester, Lincoln, Chesterfield. Lincoln, Leicester. 219
Carlisle, Bolton, Accrington, Manchester, N. Liverpool. Carlisle. 428
Barnsley, Bradford, Middlesborough, Bishops Auckland, Tynemouth. Outside Bishops Auckland & E. of Barnsley. 438
2999
69

Sample Two. Queues, Orange Scheme, Points, Advertising. Questionnaire 8.

A=200 B=600 C=1100 D=1100 Total
U R U R U R U R U R
1. Scotland 16 6 60 7 112 10 112 10 300 33
2. South Wales 6 6 27 10 57 10 63 4 153 30
3. South West 10 6 31 13 61 21 61 20 162 60
4. South 9 2 27 6 50 11 50 11 136 30
5. S.E. & London 34 2 102 7 187 14 187 14 510 37
6. Eastern 6 7 22 15 41 27 41 27 110 76
7. Midland 16 2 51 6 91 10 90 11 248 29
8. N. Midland 10 5 30 14 55 25 55 25 150 69
9. North West 26 2 77 8 137 20 145 13 385 43
10. North & N.E. 25 4 80 7 144 17 145 16 394 44
Total 158 42 507 93 934 165 949 151 2548 451
Urban Calls Rural Calls Total
Glasgow, S. Dundee, Perth. Dundee, Perth. 333
Cardiff, Ebbw Vale. Ebbw Vale. 183
Bristol, S. Yeovil, Plymouth. Yeovil, Plymouth. 223
Reading, Southampton, High Wycombe. High Wycombe. 166
London (400), Reigate, Guildford. Reigate, Guildford. 547
Norwich, Braintree, Hertford. Braintree, Hertford. 186
Birmingham, E. Rugby, Stoke, Worcester. Worcester. 277
Northampton, Market Harborough, Derby. Derby, Market Harborough. 219
Lancaster, Preston, Rochdale, Manchester, S. Birkenhead. Lancaster. 428
Halifax, Leeds, Sheffield, Chester-le-Street, Wallsend. Chester-le-Street, Sheffield W. 438
2999

The Validity of the Samples .

Only regional, rural and urban and social class figures were predetermined. It is therefore of interest to compare other sample details which were thrown up by both samples. No directions were given to investigators in order to ensure such uniformity, and the results may be taken to indicate that samples were representative and comparable.

70

Family Types

Sample One Sample Two
49.5% Adults only. 50.5%
12.4% Adults and under 5s . 10.8%
27.5% Adults and 5-17s 27.1%
10.2% Adults, 0-5 s and 5-17s 11.6%
1.71 5-17s in their families. 1.65
1.2 0-5s in their families 1.3
2.8 Adults in families with adults only. 2.65

Family Sizes .

The information derived from the samples is compared below with 1931 census figures and an estimate made in the “Home Market” book of statistics for 1937. It will be seen that in both samples trends were continued, maybe emphasized somewhat by war-time conditions. The figures analyse for all persons covered in the investigations (i.e. households) the size of the families into which they fall.

Family Size 1931 1937 Sample 1 Sample 2
% % % %
2 11.7 12.9 13.4 15.0
3 19.4 21.0 25.7 24.5
4 20.9 22.0 24.7 25.8
5 17.0 17.0 15.3 15.9
6-7 20.2 18.7 14.3 13.8
8 and over 10.8 8.2 6.6 5.0

Ages of Housewives Interviewed

Sample 1 Sample 2
% %
Under 35 24.4 24.0
35-50 46.6 44.5
Over 50 29.2 31.5

The Results of both samples compared .

Some further check on the validity of the sampling method may be derived from a comparison of answers obtained on both samples to the questions on advertising which were on both questionnaires.

1. If the Ministry of Food wants to give you any information or tell you about any of its schemes, what way would suit you best.

Sample 1 Total Sample 2
36.2 Papers and Magazines 36.2 36.4
60.0 Wireless 60.3 60.4
2.5 Posters 2.3 2.1
1.3 Other ways 1.2 1.1
2780 Sample 5414 2634

2. Have you been to any wartime Food Demonstrations.

Sample 1 Total Sample 2
8.8 Yes 8.5 8.2
89.3 No 90.3 91.4
1.8 Don’t know about them 1.2 0.2
2979 Sample 5752 2773

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close